When asked the pros of mobile device usage in the classroom,
he proclaimed, “instant feedback, on the spot grading, and confidentiality for
students.” There is “adaptability into
other activities/custom classroom tech initiatives based on the tech skill
level of the teacher.” The challenges he faced included “cost,
implementation skills, and student acceptance.
If you are using phones, you must address regulation of approved
apps/uses vs. distractors.”
At his current school, which is online, he mentioned that he
tried Twitter, but “it was too new, and they didn’t have the API out then, so
it was a no-go.” He added that you could
do a discussion board type of activity with Twitter and hashtags, and “aggregate
it all live in the class on your projector if you want.”
He concluded our interview by saying that he “loved the
response system because it provided all of the pros to using phones/social
media/text without the perils faced in a classroom.” After further researching the response systems,
I believe that the various devices would be beneficial in the classroom. These devices would be available to all
students… same brand, same features. It
could also be a stepping stone to utilizing cell phones in the classroom. Of course, cost would have to be addressed,
but these devices could be shared among teachers. As far as parental feedback, I think parents
would be accepting of these devices and their implementation in the
classroom. In addition, school policy
must be followed whether it allows cell phone usage or bans it. If they are permitted, students should be
educated on proper usage, just as with the response system devices. If cell phones are not permitted in the classroom,
these response systems and other Web 2.0 tools would be wonderful learning
tools in an educational setting.
No comments:
Post a Comment